Community Empowerment, Sustainability of Forest Conservation Projects and the Moderating Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Practices in Kenya

Download PDF

Abstract

This research sought to investigate the moderating influence of monitoring and evaluation practices on the relationship between community empowerment and the sustainability of forest conservation projects. This study was conducted in Taita-Taveta County, located in the southern part of Kenya. Community empowerment is viewed as a process and an end where community members gain control of their lives. The empowerment practices considered were knowledge and skills empowerment, decision-making empowerment, conflict resolution empowerment and income-generating empowerment activities. The study relied on a cross-sectional survey study design. A sample of 365 respondents for quantitative data was determined using Yamane formulae. Mixed methods were used to collect and analyse data. Cluster sampling and systematic sampling were used progressively to select respondents for quantitative questions, while those for qualitative questions were selected purposively. Additional data collection methods were observation and document analysis. The study noted that projects implemented in the study area were barely sustainable, with at least 44.1% of respondents agreeing while 52.1% neither agreed nor disagreed. Regression analysis results indicated the R-square change (model 2) of 0.015, which implied that model 2 with monitoring and evaluation practices positively enhanced the influence of community empowerment activities on the sustainability of forest conservation practices by at least 1.5%. Based on the results, the study concluded that monitoring and evaluation practices enhance the sustainability of forest conservation projects with a recommendation that project designers should always include monitoring and evaluation practices in their projects.

Authors

• Humphrey Mwandawiro Mwambeo (University of Nairobi)
• Lydiah Nyaguthii Wambugu (The University of Nairobi)
• Raphael Ondieki Nyonje (The University of Nairobi)

References

1. Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006
2. Ahmed, Y., Jamil, M., & Ashraf, M. Z. (2022). Monitoring & evaluation matrix for disaster risk reduction in rural settlements of Punjab. An Analysis of Economic & Land Use Enclaves. 19(2), 9383–9390.
3. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2016). National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environmental Science and Policy, 66, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008
4. Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3510. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdf [Accessed 22 May 2014] (Issue February).
5. Anderson, M. (2015). Challenges to implementing integrated pest management in schools?: what we have learned from field visits. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 14(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2014.998795
6. Asige, M. L. ., & Omuse, O. D. . (2022). Influence of Post-Harvest Technology on Food Security in Narok East sub-County, Kenya. Interdisciplinary Journal of Rural and Community Studies, 4, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijrcs-2022.vol4.01
7. Barbierato, E., & Gribaudo, M. (2014). Performance evaluation of NoSQL big-data applications using multi-formalism models. Future Generation Computer Systems. 37, 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.12.036
8. Beckley, T., Parkins, J., & Stedman, R. (2002). Indicators of forest-dependent community sustainability: The evolution of research. Forestry Chronicle, 78(5), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc78626-5
9. Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environment and Science Education, 3, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.213a
10. Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., König, A., von Wehrden, H., Schäpke, N. A., Laubichler, M. D., & Lang, D. J. (2021). A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z
11. Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035137
12. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
13. Evangelista, P., Santoro, L., & Thomas, A. (2018). Environmental sustainability in third-party logistics service providers: A systematic literature review from 2000-2016. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051627
14. Government of Kenya (GoK). (2005). Laws of Kenya, the Kenya Forests Act, 2005. http://www.kenyaforestservice.org/images/MMMB/forests act no.7 of 2005.pdf
15. Himberg, N., Omoro, L., Pellikka, P., & Luukkanen, O. (2009). The benefits and constraints of participation in forest management: The case of Taita hills, Kenya. Fennia, 187(1), 61–76.
16. Rajat, J., Jefwa, J., & Mwafaida, J. (2017). Survey on indigenous food plants of Kaya Kauma and Kaya Tsolokero in Kilifi County, Kenya. Journal of Life Sciences, 11(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7391/2017.02.004
17. Kadurenge, B. M., & Nyonje, R. O. (2017). In Search for an alternative stakeholder-participation model. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 124–138.
18. Kerrigan, D., Kennedy, C. E., Morgan-Thomas, R., Reza-Paul, S., Mwangi, P., Win, K. T., McFall, A., Fonner, V. A., & Butler, J. (2015). A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: Effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up. The Lancet, 385(9963), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60973-9
19. Kyalo, D.N, Mulwa, A.S, & Nyonje, R. . (2012). Monitoring and evaluation of projects and programs: A handbook for students and practitioners (2nd ed.). Aura Publishers.
20. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
21. Njoroge, N. N., Wambugu, L. N., Wanyoike, J. N., & Gathiru, M. K. (2016). Effectiveness of empowerment evaluation approach in community programs. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(6), 194–200. http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_7_No_6_June_2016/18.pdf
22. Owuor, F. O., Rambo, C. M., Nyonje, R. O., & Odundo, P. A. (2016). Influence of human resource capacity for monitoring and. 4(5), 45–59.
23. Samsu, S., Kustati, M., Perrodin, D. D., Ritonga, M., Kosim, M., Rusmini, R., & Suwendi, S. (2021). Community empowerment in leading pesantren: A research of Nyai’s leadership. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.21833
24. Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Song, X., & Swiderska, K. (2016). Food and agriculture; Climate change Smallholder farming systems in southwest China exploring key trends and innovations for resilience funding acknowledgement. In Iied (issue September). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3897
25. Steele, J., Dredge, D., & Scherrer, P. (2017). Monitoring and evaluation practices of volunteer tourism organisations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(11), 1674–1690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1306067
26. Sulemana, M., & Simon, K. K. (2018). An assessment of stakeholder participation in monitoring and evaluation of district assembly projects and programmes in the Savelugu- Nanton Municipality Assembly, Ghana. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 15(1), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v15i1.9
27. Todorov, T. S. (2014). Evaluating project and program management as factor for socio-economic development within EU. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.092
28. Todorovi?, M. L., Petrovi?, D. T., Mihi?, M. M., Obradovi?, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.009
29. Zimmerman, M. . (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organisational and community levels of analysis. In Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–59). Kluwer Academic.