Posted in Articles

A participatory lens to enhance collaborative learning among university students in rural South Africa

   June 22, 2025  Leave a Comment on A participatory lens to enhance collaborative learning among university students in rural South Africa

Download PDF

Abstract

Collaborative learning has been recognised as a highly effective approach to enhancing critical thinking, problem-solving, and overall academic performance. However, rural university students face unique challenges that may hinder their participation and engagement in collaborative learning activities. This gap may subsequently affect their learning effectiveness, leading to poor academic performance. Therefore, this study explores the challenges faced by rurally located university students in collaborative learning and strategies to enhance their participation. The study is underpinned by social learning theory and framed within a transformative paradigm using a qualitative research approach. Participatory Research was employed as a research design to provide inclusive opportunities for participants to be actively involved in the process of finding solutions to their problems. Focus group discussions were conducted to elicit information from 10 randomly selected rural university students enrolled in a particular module at a selected university in the Eastern Cape province. Thematic analysis was utilised to analyse the data. The results indicate that the main challenges faced by rural university students in collaborative learning include limited access to resources and technology, conflicting time schedules, and the unavailability of students. In contrast, providing adequate access to resources and technology, along with social and institutional support, is essential for enhancing collaborative learning among students in rural universities. In conclusion, promoting collaborative learning among rural university students requires universities to invest in adequate resources, implement flexible learning schedules, and create supportive learning environments.

Authors

  • Bunmi Isaiah Omodan (Walter Sisulu University, South Africa)
  • Andy Mafunda (Walter Sisulu University, South Africa)
  • Enathi Mbebe (Walter Sisulu University, South Africa)
  • Somikazi Mdolota (Walter Sisulu University, South Africa)

References

  1. Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
  2. Alhinty, M. (2014, November). Young language learners’ collaborative learning and social interaction as a motivational aspect of the iPad. In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL2014) (pp. 64-69). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2014.7011106
  3. Allan, J. (2017). An analysis of Albert Bandura’s aggression: A social learning analysis. CRC Press.
  4. Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Zeki, A. M. (2017). A model of using social media for collaborative learning to enhance learners’ performance on learning. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(4), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002
  5. Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
  6. Arnold, D., Glässel, A., Böttger, T., Sarma, N., Bethmann, A., & Narimani, P. (2022). “What do you need? What are you experiencing?” Relationship building and power dynamics in participatory research projects: Critical self-reflections of researchers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159336
  7. Aruleba, K., & Jere, N. (2022). Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies. Scientific African, e01190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01190
  8. Barlas, C. (2000). Towards a changing paradigm: Transformative learning and social change action. California Institute of Integral Studies.
  9. Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(3), 63–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102939
  10. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  11. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 191-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41756482
  12. Brieger, E., Arghode, V., & McLean, G. (2020). Connecting theory and practice: Reviewing six learning theories to inform online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4/5), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0116
  13. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
  14. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
  15. Chakraborty, P., Mittal, P., Gupta, M. S., Yadav, S., & Arora, A. (2021). Opinion of students on online education during the COVID?19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 357–365.
  16. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
  17. Deaton, S. (2015). Social learning theory in the age of social media: Implications for educational practitioners. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 1–6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098574
  18. Doyle, M., & Timonen, V. (2010). Lessons from a community-based participatory research project: Older people’s and researchers’ reflections. Research on Aging, 32(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027509351477
  19. Dube, B. (2020). Rural online learning in the context of COVID-19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
  20. Dzansi, D. Y., & Amedzo, K. (2014). Integrating ICT into rural South African schools: Possible solutions for challenges. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890145
  21. Edinyang, S. D. (2016). The significance of social learning theories in the teaching of social studies education. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Research, 2(1), 40–45.
  22. García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
  23. Godat, M. (2012). Collaborative learning and critical thinking in technology-enhanced environments: An instructional design framework [Doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology].
  24. Gorvine, B. J., & Smith, H. D. (2015). Predicting student success in a psychological statistics course emphasising collaborative learning. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562679
  25. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
  26. Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando Garijo, A., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Fernández-Río, J. (2019). Cooperative learning and students’ motivation, social interactions and attitudes: Perspectives from two different educational stages. Sustainability, 11(24), 7005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247005
  27. Howorth, C., Smith, S. M., & Parkinson, C. (2012). Social learning and social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0022
  28. Jackson, K. M., Pukys, S., Castro, A., Hermosura, L., Mendez, J., Vohra-Gupta, S., … & Morales, G. (2018). Using the transformative paradigm to conduct a mixed methods needs assessment of a marginalised community: Methodological lessons and implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.010
  29. James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnis, C., & Stephanou, A. (1999). Rural and isolated school students and their higher education choices: A re-examination of student location, socioeconomic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage. Commissioned report. http://www.dety?.gov.au/nbeet/publications/#hec
  30. Jena, R. K. (2015). Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academicians. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1116–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020
  31. Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
  32. Jimola, D. F. E., & Ofodu, G. O. (2021). Sustaining learning during COVID-19 seismic shift: The need to develop flexible pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 3(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.02
  33. Jinadu, D. A., Oyaremi, D. M., & Rufai, D. M. (2021). Assessment of the Oyo State Teaching Service Commission interactive learning platforms during COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 3(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.04
  34. Kemparaj, U., & Chavan, S. (2013). Qualitative research: A brief description. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 67(3/4), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.121127
  35. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  36. Kilgo, C. A., Ezell Sheets, J. K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
  37. Kirkgöz, Y. (2014). English language teaching in Turkey: Challenges for the 21st century. In Teaching English to the World (pp. 159–170). Routledge.
  38. Klette, K., Sahlström, F., Blikstad-Balas, M., Luoto, J., Tanner, M., Tengberg, M., … & Slotte, A. (2018). Justice through participation: Student engagement in Nordic classrooms. Education Inquiry, 9(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1428036
  39. Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
  40. McGregor, S. L. (2009). Reorienting consumer education using social learning theory: Sustainable development via authentic consumer pedagogy. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00766.x
  41. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612
  42. Naidoo, S., & Raju, J. (2012). Impact of the digital divide on information literacy training in a higher education context. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 78(1), 34–44. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC129280
  43. Omodan, B. I., & Ige, O. A. (2021). Sustaining collaborative learning among university students in the wake of COVID-19: The perspective of online community project. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.20
  44. Omodan, B. I., & Ige, O. A. (2021). University students’ perceptions of curriculum content delivery during COVID-19 new normal in South Africa. Qualitative Research in Education, 10(2), 204–227. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2021.7446
  45. Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020). Decolonisation of knowledge construction in university classrooms: The place of social constructivism. African Journal of Gender, Society & Development, 9(2), 183–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2020/9n2a10
  46. Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues, and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
  47. Skinner, W. F., & Fream, A. M. (1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034004005
  48. Swartz, S., & Scott, D. (2012, August). Restitution: A revised paradigm for the transformation of poverty and inequality in South Africa. In Strategies to overcome poverty and inequality: Towards Carnegie 3 Conference, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 3-5).
  49. Thota, N. (2015). Connectivism and the use of technology/media in collaborative teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(142), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20131
  50. Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and higher education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
  51. Walton, E., Bowman, B., & Osman, R. (2015). Promoting access to higher education in an unequal society. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(1), 262–269. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC172787
  52. Wilkinson, S. (2015). Focus groups. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 199–221). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  53. Woodward, W. R. (1982). The “discovery” of social behaviourism and social learning theory, 1870–1980. American Psychologist, 37(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.4.396
  54. Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart learning environments, 3, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
Share: Facebook
Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *